JUNE 23, 2000 


HEADLINES
 

DID YOU KNOW?
MEDI-MINUTES
MONEY MATTERS
NATIONAL NOTES
RESOURCE CORNER
TAX TID-BITS
TRUST TALK
 

HOME

Trust Talk

Maintaining ILIT Flexibility

Irrevocable life insurance trusts (ILITs) remain one of the most effective and popular estate planning tools, and we write about them quite a bit. However, some clients still worry about the issue of flexibility when deciding whether or not to create an ILIT. That concern is understandable, since in most cases the insured must retain no powers of ownership or appointment of the trust assets in order to remove the death benefits from the insured’s estate and avoid estate and gift taxes. So what happens in the case of unforeseen circumstances, such as births or deaths in the family?

Flexibility is important, and fortunately, estate planning with an ILIT need not be inflexible. The client need only weigh the benefits of various techniques to decide which will be preferable in any given situation. For example, the trust creator could

  • Give the primary beneficiary (other than a spouse) a general or special power to distribute trust assets in accordance with his or her will;
  • Grant an independent trustee power to distribute the policy to the ILIT’s beneficiary, terminate the ILIT and distribute the policy to another trust, or change the trust situs;
  • Create a "defective" or "grantor-trust" ILIT.
A grantor-trust ILIT violates one or more of the provisions of IRC §§ 673-677, thereby causing the grantor to be taxed on the trust’s income while still removing the trust assets from the grantor’s estate. Such defective ILITs are usually created intentionally, but some individuals may have created a defective ILIT by mistake by retaining a power to re-acquire trust assets by substituting assets of equivalent value, by granting a non-adverse party (someone who does not have an interest in the trust) power to add or remove beneficiaries, etc.

Whether a grantor-trust ILIT is created intentionally or unintentionally, it offers maximum flexibility (at the expense of the income tax) and opens a host of other planning opportunities that would not be possible with a traditional ILIT.

Source: National Underwriter (Life/Health Insurance Edition) 6-12-2000